Supreme Court AI copyright decision sounds sweeping but actually settles very little
AI inventor Stephen Thaler wanted the US Supreme Court to recognize a machine as the sole author of an image. The court refused, but the ruling only covers this extreme case. It says nothing about whether people can claim copyright for work they create with AI tools. The article Supreme Court AI copyright decision sounds sweeping but actually settles very little appeared first on The Decoder.
AI inventor Stephen Thaler wanted the US Supreme Court to recognize a machine as the sole author of an image. The court refused, but the ruling only covers this extreme case. It says nothing about whether people can claim copyright for work they create with AI tools.
The article Supreme Court AI copyright decision sounds sweeping but actually settles very little appeared first on The Decoder.
This article was originally published by The Decoder. View original article
Get AI news in your inbox
Daily digest of what matters in AI.