AI Giants Clash Over NY-12 Candidate: The High-Stakes Battle for AI Regulation

The Democratic primary for New York's 12th congressional district has morphed into a high-stakes showdown over the future of AI regulation. Major AI firms Anthropic and OpenAI have poured millions into this political arena, each vying for influence over who decides the rules governing AI technology.

The Candidates and the Stakes

At the heart of this costly struggle is Alex Bores, a New York state assemblyman who has unexpectedly found himself thrust into the national spotlight. The documents show that Anthropic and OpenAI view Bores as a turning point figure in shaping AI policy. His stance on AI safety regulation has transformed him from an obscure politician into a key player in the AI regulatory debate.

Since late 2025, Leading the Future, a super PAC with backing from OpenAI, Palantir, and a16z executives, has been funneling significant funds against Bores. Why? Because Bores authored groundbreaking legislation that could impose stringent regulations on AI development. The money isn't just about supporting their chosen candidate. it's about controlling the narrative around AI safety.

What's at Stake for AI?

The battle over Bores isn't just about one district. It's a microcosm of the larger debate on AI regulation. Who should hold the power to regulate AI? Should tech giants be allowed to self-regulate, or do we need independent oversight to prevent potential abuses?

Public records obtained by Machine Brief reveal that neither Anthropic nor OpenAI has been transparent about their intentions. The affected communities weren't consulted when these AI giants decided to make Bores their battleground. Accountability requires transparency. Here's what they won't release: their ultimate goals in influencing AI legislation.

The Bigger Picture

This race illustrates a clear need for reliable oversight in AI policy. The system was deployed without the safeguards the agency promised, and that's a problem. If AI companies can sway elections, what's to stop them from shaping policies that favor their interests over public safety? The gap between corporate interests and public accountability is widening. We must ask: how can we ensure that AI systems serve the public good, not just corporate profits?

The primary in New York's 12th district is more than just a political skirmish. It's a decisive moment for AI regulation. The outcome will set a precedent for how AI policies are crafted in the future. As voters head to the polls, the implications of this contest will ripple far beyond a single congressional seat.