MBMACHINE BRIEF
AnalysisOriginalsModelsResearchStartupsTools
Newsletter
Uniswap V4 Hooks Are Going to Change DeFi Forever
  1. Home
  2. /Blog
  3. /Uniswap V4 Hooks Are Going to Change DeFi Forever
UniswapDeFiDEXInnovation

Uniswap V4 Hooks Are Going to Change DeFi Forever

Whale FactorFebruary 11, 20267 min read

On this page

Share

Uniswap V2 gave us automated market making. V3 gave us concentrated liquidity. Both were revolutionary. Both changed how decentralized trading works.

V4 might be even bigger. And the reason is one word: hooks.

What Are Hooks?

In Uniswap V4, hooks are custom smart contracts that can execute logic at specific points during a swap, liquidity provision, or pool creation. Think of them as plugins for a DEX.

Before a swap executes, a hook can run. After a swap executes, a hook can run. When liquidity is added, modified, or removed, hooks can intervene. When a new pool is created, a hook defines its behavior.

This sounds technical. Let me explain why it matters with examples.

Dynamic fees. A hook can change the swap fee based on market conditions. During high volatility, fees go up (compensating LPs for impermanent loss risk). During quiet markets, fees go down (attracting more volume). This is impossible in V3, where fees are fixed at pool creation.

Time-weighted average market making (TWAMM). A hook can break large orders into smaller ones executed over time, reducing price impact. This lets on-chain trading handle institutional-size orders without crashing the price.

Limit orders on-chain. A hook can implement limit orders, where a swap only executes when the price reaches a specified level. No centralized order book needed.

KYC-gated pools. A hook can check whether a trader's address is on an approved list before allowing a swap. This enables permissioned pools for institutional users who need compliance.

Automated LP strategies. A hook can automatically rebalance LP positions based on price movements, reducing the active management required for concentrated liquidity.

The possibilities are essentially limitless. Any logic that a developer can code into a smart contract can become a hook on Uniswap V4.

Why This Is a Platform Shift

Here's the conceptual leap that most people miss.

Uniswap V1-V3 were products. A DEX. You swap Token A for Token B. That's it.

Uniswap V4 is a platform. It's an infrastructure layer that developers build on top of. The core protocol handles the low-level stuff: managing liquidity, routing swaps, settling trades. Hooks handle everything else.

This is the same shift that turned the iPhone from a phone into a platform. Before the App Store, the iPhone was a product Apple built. After the App Store, it became a platform that millions of developers built on. The apps made it infinitely more valuable than the hardware alone.

Uniswap V4's hooks are the App Store for DeFi trading. And just like the App Store, the most valuable hooks haven't been invented yet.

The Singleton Architecture

V4 also introduces a singleton contract. In V3, every pool was a separate smart contract. Creating a pool, adding liquidity, or swapping required deploying to or interacting with individual contracts. This was expensive and inefficient.

In V4, all pools live in one contract. This dramatically reduces gas costs for pool creation, multi-hop swaps, and flash accounting (where intermediate balances don't need to be settled until the end of a transaction).

The gas savings are significant. Early estimates suggest 50-99% reductions in gas costs for certain operations. Combined with the already low fees on L2s, this makes Uniswap V4 viable for trades that were previously too expensive to execute on-chain.

What This Means for Competing DEXs

If you're running a DEX that competes with Uniswap, V4 is an existential threat.

Here's why. The value proposition of most Uniswap competitors was that they offered something Uniswap didn't. Curve offered optimized stable swaps. Trader Joe offered variable fees through liquidity books. Maverick offered directional liquidity. Each was a fork or alternative that added a specific feature.

With hooks, all of those features can be implemented on Uniswap V4. Want Curve-style stable swaps? Build a hook. Want Maverick-style directional LP? Build a hook. Want Trader Joe's variable fee model? Build a hook.

Uniswap V4 doesn't just compete with other DEXs. It eats them. Any innovation that a competitor introduces can be replicated as a hook on Uniswap's far larger liquidity base.

The only defense is liquidity. If you've got deep liquidity that can't easily migrate, you might survive. But Uniswap already has the deepest liquidity in DeFi across most major pairs. Adding customizable hooks on top of that liquidity makes the moat wider, not narrower.

The Risks Nobody Is Discussing

Hooks sound amazing. But there are real risks.

Malicious hooks. A hook can execute arbitrary code. What if a hook is designed to front-run swaps? What if it silently extracts value from traders? Users interacting with a pool need to trust not just Uniswap's core protocol but also the hook attached to that pool.

This creates a trust layer that didn't exist before. In V3, you trusted Uniswap's audited, battle-tested code. In V4, you trust Uniswap's code PLUS whatever hook the pool creator attached. And hooks can be written by anyone.

Complexity explosion. The hook ecosystem will need auditing, standards, and curation. Without it, users will face a confusing landscape of thousands of hooks, most of which are untested. The UX challenge of helping users navigate this safely is enormous.

MEV amplification. Hooks that modify swap behavior (especially dynamic fees and TWAMM) create new MEV opportunities. Searchers and block builders will find ways to extract value from complex hook interactions that haven't been anticipated.

Composability risks. When hooks interact with each other or with external protocols, the complexity grows exponentially. A hook that calls an oracle, interacts with a lending protocol, and adjusts fees dynamically has a massive attack surface.

The Business Model Question

Uniswap V4 makes the fee switch even more interesting.

If hooks enable developers to build entire products on top of Uniswap, the protocol becomes a platform that captures value from an ecosystem, not just a DEX that charges swap fees. But only if the fee switch is eventually activated.

The Uniswap Foundation has been careful about this. Activating a fee on LP revenue would anger the existing user base. But a fee on hook revenue, where developers pay a small percentage for access to Uniswap's liquidity and infrastructure, could be politically easier and potentially more lucrative.

Imagine if the best hooks on Uniswap V4 generate billions in annual volume. Even a tiny protocol fee on that activity would generate significant revenue for UNI holders. That's the bull case for UNI as a platform token rather than just a governance token.

Timeline and Adoption

V4 has been in development and testing. The codebase has been audited. Deployment across Ethereum mainnet and major L2s is underway.

Early hooks are already being built by teams in the Uniswap ecosystem. The first use cases will likely be straightforward, such as dynamic fees, basic limit orders, and TWAMM. More exotic hooks will emerge as developers experiment with the design space.

The real question is adoption. Will liquidity migrate from V3 pools to V4 pools with hooks? History suggests yes. Every Uniswap version has eventually absorbed the liquidity from the previous one. V2 ate V1. V3 ate V2. V4 will eat V3.

My Take

Uniswap V4 is the most important DeFi upgrade since Uniswap V3 introduced concentrated liquidity. Hooks transform a DEX into a platform, opening a design space that we're only beginning to explore.

The short-term impact might be modest. It takes time for developers to build hooks, for users to understand them, and for liquidity to migrate. But the long-term implications are massive.

If hooks work as designed, Uniswap V4 becomes the default infrastructure layer for all on-chain trading. Every DEX innovation becomes a hook rather than a competitor. Every custom trading strategy becomes programmable.

The winners will be Uniswap (the platform), creative hook developers (the builders), and traders (who get better prices, more features, and lower costs). The losers will be every competing DEX that can't offer something a hook can't replicate.

This is one of those rare moments in DeFi where the technology is genuinely ahead of what the market has priced in.

Related Articles

Curve Finance Almost Died and Came Back Stronger
CurveFeb 2, 2026

Curve Finance Almost Died and Came Back Stronger

A massive exploit, a founder liquidation crisis, and a death spiral in confidence. Curve survived it all. Here's the comeback story that nobody expected.

Centralized vs Decentralized Exchanges: The Real Pros and Cons
ExchangesJan 16, 2026

Centralized vs Decentralized Exchanges: The Real Pros and Cons

CEXs are easy but risky. DEXs give you control but can be clunky. Here's an honest breakdown of when to use each and why most people need both.

An AI Wrote the Code That Just Drained $1.8 Million From a DeFi Protocol
DeFiFeb 18, 2026

An AI Wrote the Code That Just Drained $1.8 Million From a DeFi Protocol

A pricing glitch that lasted only minutes left DeFi lender Moonwell with $1.8 million in bad debt. The faulty code was co-authored by Claude Opus 4.6, an AI coding assistant. We've officially entered the era of AI-generated exploits.

← Back to all articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Newsletter
  • Search
  • Sitemap

Content

  • Original Analysis
  • Blog
  • Glossary
  • Best Lists
  • AI Tools

Categories

  • Models
  • Research
  • Startups
  • Robotics
  • Policy
  • Business
  • Analysis
  • Originals

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
Machine Brief|

2026 Machine Brief. All rights reserved.