MBMACHINE BRIEF
AnalysisOriginalsModelsResearchStartupsTools
Newsletter

Navigate

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Newsletter
  • Search
  • Sitemap

Content

  • Original Analysis
  • Blog
  • Glossary
  • Best Lists
  • AI Tools

Categories

  • Models
  • Research
  • Startups
  • Robotics
  • Policy
  • Business
  • Analysis
  • Originals

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
Machine Brief|

2026 Machine Brief. All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. /Best Of
  3. /Best Layer 2 Networks Compared

Best Layer 2 Networks Compared

Compare the best Ethereum Layer 2 networks by fees, speed, TVL, and ecosystem. Arbitrum, Optimism, Base, zkSync, and more in 2026.

Updated February 19, 2026·6 picks reviewed

Layer 2 networks process transactions off Ethereum mainnet and post compressed data back for security. The result: dramatically lower fees and faster confirmations while inheriting Ethereum's security. L2s have gone from experimental tech to essential infrastructure. Most DeFi activity has moved to L2s because paying $50 in gas for a $100 swap on mainnet doesn't make sense. The big question for users: which L2 should you use? It depends on what you're doing. Some have better DeFi ecosystems, some are cheaper, and some are backed by major companies bringing in users. Here's how they stack up.

Quick Comparison

#NameBest ForTop ProTop Con
1ArbitrumDeFi users who want the deepest liquidity on an L2Largest L2 by TVL7-day withdrawal delay to Ethereum
2BaseConsumer AI, social apps, and Coinbase usersBacked by Coinbase (easy onboarding)Centralized sequencer (Coinbase)
3OptimismUsers who support the Superchain ecosystem visionOP Stack powers multiple L2sSmaller TVL than Arbitrum
4zkSync EraUsers who prefer ZK-proof security and faster withdrawalsZK-proof based (faster finality)Smaller ecosystem than Arbitrum/Base
5ScrollDevelopers and users who want the most EVM-compatible ZK L2Closest to true EVM equivalenceNewer with smaller ecosystem
6StarknetTechnical users and devs interested in cutting-edge ZK technologySTARK proofs (no trusted setup)Requires Cairo (not EVM compatible)

Detailed Reviews

#1

Arbitrum

Learn More

The largest L2 by TVL and number of protocols. Arbitrum One uses optimistic rollup technology and hosts the most mature DeFi ecosystem of any L2. GMX, Camelot, Radiant, and hundreds of other protocols call Arbitrum home.

Best for: DeFi users who want the deepest liquidity on an L2

Pros

  • Largest L2 by TVL
  • Most DeFi protocols
  • Battle-tested (live since 2021)
  • Low fees ($0.01-$0.10 per tx)

Cons

  • 7-day withdrawal delay to Ethereum
  • Centralized sequencer (decentralization planned)
  • ARB token has underperformed
#2

Base

Coinbase's L2 built on the OP Stack. Base has no native token and benefits from Coinbase's 100M+ user base for onboarding. The SocialFi and consumer AI scene on Base is thriving.

Best for: Consumer AI, social apps, and Coinbase users

Pros

  • Backed by Coinbase (easy onboarding)
  • No native token (no sell pressure)
  • Growing consumer AI ecosystem
  • Very low fees

Cons

  • Centralized sequencer (Coinbase)
  • Younger ecosystem than Arbitrum
  • Dependent on Coinbase's reputation
#3

Optimism

Learn More

The L2 behind the OP Stack, which Base, Zora, and others are built on. Optimism has a unique retroactive public goods funding model and a growing Superchain vision where multiple L2s share infrastructure.

Best for: Users who support the Superchain ecosystem vision

Pros

  • OP Stack powers multiple L2s
  • Retroactive public goods funding
  • Strong governance model
  • Good DeFi ecosystem

Cons

  • Smaller TVL than Arbitrum
  • 7-day withdrawal delay
  • Superchain vision still developing
#4

zkSync Era

A ZK-rollup L2 that uses zero-knowledge proofs for faster finality than optimistic rollups. No 7-day withdrawal delay. Native account abstraction makes the UX smoother. Ecosystem is growing but still behind Arbitrum.

Best for: Users who prefer ZK-proof security and faster withdrawals

Pros

  • ZK-proof based (faster finality)
  • Native account abstraction
  • No 7-day withdrawal wait
  • Growing ecosystem

Cons

  • Smaller ecosystem than Arbitrum/Base
  • ZK token airdrop was controversial
  • Higher computational cost for proofs
#5

Scroll

A zkEVM L2 focused on EVM equivalence. Scroll aims to be the closest to running exactly like Ethereum but with ZK proofs for scaling. Bytecode-level compatibility means existing Ethereum tools work out of the box.

Best for: Developers and users who want the most EVM-compatible ZK L2

Pros

  • Closest to true EVM equivalence
  • ZK-proof security model
  • Easy to port Ethereum dApps
  • Growing steadily

Cons

  • Newer with smaller ecosystem
  • Lower TVL than competitors
  • Less brand recognition
#6

Starknet

Uses STARK proofs (vs SNARKs) and has its own programming language (Cairo) instead of Solidity. More technically ambitious but requires dApps to be rewritten. The trade-off is potentially better long-term scaling.

Best for: Technical users and devs interested in cutting-edge ZK technology

Pros

  • STARK proofs (no trusted setup)
  • Potentially superior long-term scaling
  • Strong technical team
  • Native account abstraction

Cons

  • Requires Cairo (not EVM compatible)
  • Smaller dApp ecosystem
  • Higher barrier for developers
  • STRK token performance has been weak

Frequently Asked Questions

Which Layer 2 has the lowest fees?
After EIP-4844 (proto-danksharding), most L2s have fees under $0.05 per transaction. Base and Arbitrum are typically the cheapest for simple transfers. Fees on all L2s dropped 90%+ after blob transactions went live.
Is my money safe on a Layer 2?
L2s inherit Ethereum's security for transaction validity. The main risk is the sequencer (the entity that orders transactions) being centralized. If the sequencer goes down, you may need to wait for forced withdrawal mechanisms. Most major L2s are working on decentralizing their sequencers.
How do I bridge funds to a Layer 2?
Use the official bridge for each L2 (Arbitrum Bridge, Base Bridge, etc.) or a third-party bridge like Across, Stargate, or Hop Protocol. Third-party bridges are faster but add smart contract risk. Always start with a small test transaction.

Related Resources

Learn: Layer 2 NetworksGlossary: Layer 2Compare: Arbitrum vs OptimismArbitrum Price
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Always do your own research before investing in any AI technology or using any platform. Some links may be affiliate links.