Zoë Hitzig, a former researcher at OpenAI, recently made headlines with her decision to resign from the company. This move coincided with OpenAI's controversial test of ads in ChatGPT, sparking questions about the ethical implications of monetizing such a popular AI platform.
The Resignation
Hitzig, who has an impressive background as an economist and poet, announced her resignation through a guest essay in The New York Times. She left OpenAI on February 9, 2026, the same day the company began experimenting with advertisements in its AI chatbot.
In her essay, Hitzig expressed disillusionment with the direction OpenAI was taking. She originally joined the firm to address the challenges AI could create. But she felt the company had shifted its focus, no longer asking the key questions she was there to help answer.
The Ad Controversy
Hitzig stopped short of labeling advertising as inherently wrong. Rather, she emphasized the unique risks ads pose in the context of ChatGPT. Users engage with the platform on deeply personal topics, trusting they're interacting with a tool free of hidden motives. This has led to what Hitzig describes as an "archive of human candor that has no precedent."
With such sensitive data at stake, the introduction of ads raises ethical concerns. Could this shift in strategy lead to the same pitfalls that plagued Facebook a decade ago? It's a question worth considering, especially given the trust users place in AI systems.
The Bigger Picture
Advertising in AI raises broader questions about privacy and user manipulation. If users lose trust in ChatGPT, what does that mean for the future of AI adoption? Transparency and ethical considerations must play a turning point role in shaping AI's trajectory.
OpenAI's decision to test ads in ChatGPT is a high-stakes gamble. The numbers tell a different story, suggesting potential risks that could outweigh the benefits. As AI continues to evolve, companies must tread carefully to maintain user trust and uphold ethical standards.
